Monthly Archives: November 2010

Wik Wik Wack: Libraries that Wiki

Libraries that use wikis are not really wack, but actually pretty smart.

In fact, I’ve drawn on wikis as a rich source of information for this blog, using lists made by librarians on various topics in Library 2.0 including wikis listing libraries using blogs, libraries using Twitter, libraries using MySpace, and yes, even libraries that wiki. By compiling resources on a single topic into a central place that can be edited by other librarians and information professionals, others can do a focused search, without re-inventing the wheel. Check out the links to the right for library wikis that I’ve used in my research for this project.

According to Tom Stafford and Matt Web in their article What is a Wiki (and How to Use One in your Projects), a wiki is

“a website where users can add, remove, and edit every page using a web browser. It’s so terrifically easy for people to jump in and revise pages that wikis are becoming known as the tool of choice for large, multiple-participant projects”.

This short video by Ramit, available on YouTube and also via Creative Commons, provides a nice summary by various people who are using wikis:

So while wikis can be useful for collecting and finding data, they are ultimately a collaboration tool. LibraryWikis lists four ways that libraries are collaborating using wikis:

1. Collaboration between Libraries (45.7 percent);
2. Collaboration between Library staff (31.4 percent);
3. Collaboration between Library Staff and Patrons (14.3 percent);
4. Collaboration between Patrons (8.6 percent).

Let’s look at some examples of how real libraries are collaborating this way.

The most common type of wiki used in libraries, are wikis used for collaboration between libraries. Library Success: A Best Practices Wiki, a “collaboration between libraries” wiki, allows collaborators from libraries all over the world to share their successes with the library community, for the benefit of all. The wiki is arranged into various library practice subjects, some small (with just a definition of the term) and some larger (with definitions, links and blog posts from information professionals). For example, on the topic of “radical reference”, there is a link to the Radical Reference website, as well as blogs on the topic, and links to journal articles on the topic. Another “between libraries” wiki example is the Yukon Library Association wiki, where members share information about courses, workshops, legislation and social events.

The second most common way wikis are being used in libraries is between staff of the same institution. The University of Minnesota Libraries Staff Website is a wiki where library staff of that institution can share links to information on Occupational Health and Safety (OHS), upcoming events, Human Resources FAQs and links to emergency procedures.

Less common are wikis for the purpose of libraries collaborating with patrons. This wiki from the Doucette Library at the University of Calgary contains lists of popular web pages on various subjects. Other than that, there is not much going on with this site. It’s very bare bones, and looks like it is either just getting started or it has been abandoned. This lovely page from Loudon Public Libraries offers many possibilities for patrons to collaborate with library staff. I noticed that most of the posts were from one person; I’m assuming that person is the librarian. Still, this is a nice example of a clear and easy-to navigate wiki that is managed by a library for the purpose of collaborating with patrons.

Least popular are wikis that are created for patrons to collaborate with each other. There are very few examples on LibraryWiki’s page on patron-to-patron library wikis, and most of them are defunct. One that is not defunct is Biz Wiki, managed by Chad Boeninger, Reference & Instruction Technology Coordinator at Ohio University’s Alden Library, and also the Subject Librarian for the College of Business. While this site is great, and has the potential of being a collaborative space between patrons, it really functions as a reference and subject wiki for students, that is maintained by the Librarian.

All in all, I think wikis are a great tool for collaborating and managing projects collectively. They are free and relatively easy to learn how to use. There are a few wiki software programs to choose from, so once again, do your research to see if and how this can be applied in your library.

team work

It's all about collaboration, baby! Image by Budzlife for Creative Commons.


What’s your status?

Is your library the baddest thing to hit the scene since the gangsta lean, (to quote MC Lyte)? Probably not. But that’s OK. You can get on board with Facebook or MySpace, or any number of social networking sites to connect with your library community. My advice is, just don’t try to be cool. Social networking can be one extra tool in a library’s outreach plan but it must also be created and maintained in a way that is somewhat organic and real, and not forced.

MC Lyte is cool. You don't have to be. Photo by Travis Hudgons/PictureAtlanta.Net available via Creative Commons.

Let’s back track a bit. For those who don’t know, ODLIS (the Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science by Joan M. Reitz) defines a social networking as:

An electronic service (usually Web-based) designed to allow users to establish a personal or organizational profile and contact other individuals for the purpose of communicating, collaborating, and/or sharing content with them. Most services allow members to restrict the visibility of their profile information to registered service members only, people on an established list of contacts, or particular groups of service users. Examples include Bebo, Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and Buzz from Google. Synonymous with social network service.

Like any Web 2.0 tool, libraries need to proceed with intention and purpose. Sarah Houghton-Jan, in her blog offers a few tips for those considering incorporating social networking into their library practice. The first and foremost is that you need to do your research; look at all the features available, check out a few different sites and see how other libraries are doing. Also, keep the posts current; you work hard to build up a following and you want to give your followers and friends something interesting to engage with. Houghton-Jan points out that it’s great to have lots of friends, but the real reason for being there in the first place is to serve your clients; in other words, don’t collect friends for the sake of trying to look popular! And finally, don’t forget to have some fun.

There are lots of libraries using MySpace. You can find a list of libraries using MySpace to target their teen audience here. It’s difficult for me to assess the usefulness of these sites since I’m not a teenager. I also don’ t spend a lot of time on MySpace. I hope that they are reaching their target audiences by posting favourite books, event notices and pictures from the library. And while it may be true that the point is not to collect friends, of the library social networking profiles I checked out on MySpace, none of them had very many followers, and that has to say something. Even if relatively few followers were actively engaging, that would be a good sign but this did not seem to be the case. Oak Park Public Library’s MySpace is a clean page that is easy enough to navigate. My perusal of the comments on the page reveals that most of the followers are other libraries and authors of Young Adult novels. Some of comments are from young people who love libraries, but no one asked any questions or offered up suggestions other than for people to read a book that they had authored personally. This may add to existing presence for a library in a community, but is hardly an outreach plan on its own.

I would be more inclined to friend a library on Facebook, since I do actually spend time on that site. I “like” pages that I’m interested in hearing news from. (By clicking “like”, you essentially become a follower of that organization’s page and any news generated from them will go into your personal news feed.) Going to the Vancouver Public Library’s profile on Facebook, I see that there is much more activity than on the Oak Park Public Library’s MySpace page. For one thing, they have almost 1,500 followers. Posts are updated frequently (every few days) with interesting and dynamic content including event invitations, links and pictures. Perhaps most importantly, followers are active in engaging the forum and each other in conversations via commenting on links. In terms of what works for clients, I guess it depends where you go; friending VPL on Facebook works for me since I’m already on the networking site and interested in VPL goings-on.

I never would have heard about VPL’s screening of this film if it weren’t for the event on their Facebook page. Trailer available on YouTube.

What are you Doing? Libraries That Microblog

Libraries that wha….? Don’t be afraid. You remember how the word “blog” is a contraction of the words “Web” and “log”. Well, a microblog is just a small (micro), focused, daily (or twice-weekly, or more, or many times a day) journal about what’s going on. But let’s face it: we’re really talking about Twitter. Twitter, according to their website, is “a real time information network” using “small bursts of information called tweets”, messages only 140 characters in length maximum.

In their book Twitter: Tips, Tricks, and Tweets, McFedries, Paul Cashmore, Pete Mcfedries explain the concept of Twitter as simply an answer to the question: What are you doing? Whereas libraries can use a blog like a newsletter, letting patrons know about what’s going on in the library, offering reviews of books and events and the like, a microblog like Twitter lets libraries and librarians offer short, to the point answers to the question, What are you doing?

Libraries can use Twitter like anyone else, to share information about what’s going on to interested subscribers, and to follow other libraries and organizations to stay in the loop within the information field.

Fog horn

What is your library broadcasting? Image by Cardiff Council Flat Holm Project, used with permission via Creative Commons.

Check out this Twitter page from the Broken Arrow Library in Oklahoma: Not only does the Library offer invitations to events, notify of holiday closures and point subscribers to library workshops, but they also provide links to event pages, tutorials and booklists that people can easily click on to be transported to tools and other interesting stuff.

Homework NYC is a Twitter site geared towards teens that also makes announcements about events, such as this tweet from November 10, 2010:

Brooklyn Public Library has a wonderful exhibition called Drawn in Brooklyn showcasing the work of 34 children’s book illustrators.

And links to homework help such as this tweet:

Dial-A-Teacher App Launches

I especially like seeing who libraries are following themselves, since you can click and link through some interesting pages and see what other people are up to in the library world and beyond. It was through this meandering that I found the microblog for Central Park, which is kinda cool.

However, as Sarah Milstein points out in her article Twitter for Libraries (and Librarians), Twitter is not just about broadcasting what you are doing, in a one-way manner for people to receive information about YOU. If the point is to actually connect with people, then Libraries must also be open to having a conversation on Twitter. Milstein recommends that Librarians take the time to respond to questions and otherwise engage with patrons. She also advises that before any library starts microblogging, it is important to first take a few days to get to know Twitter, seeing what people are doing and using the medium with intention.

As with any 2.0 technology, and tools in general, the point is to use them to your advantage and not just for the sake of using the latest technology. This wiki article by 2008 Florida State University LIS student Lindy Brown lists the pros and cons of Twittering for libraries. Briefly, the bonuses of Twitter include that it’s free to use, relatively easy to update, it’s collaborative and has at the core of it a value of providing customer service that targets the library users. Brown includes among the drawbacks: that it’s one more thing to update, a lack of support from library colleagues who may not understand its usefulness, a potential select audience, and the fact that it is brief (140 characters or less) may detract from communication.

Do your research. Will Twittering work in your library? Is there enough interest from library colleagues and patrons? Who will be responsible for updates? Will you be filling an information need, or just creating another project for staff? For more information, check out some of the links on the right.

Join the conversation. Last Conversation Piece, Image by cliff1066. Used with permission via Creative Commons

Social bookmarking: what’s it all about?

The quick and dirty definition of social bookmarking, courtesy of Educause Learning Initiative:

Social bookmarking is the practice of saving bookmarks to
public Web site and “tagging” them with keywords.

While bookmarking (in the Web world, anyway) refers to saving a link that you want to return to by bookmarking it on your home computer, social bookmarking is about sharing favourite links. Social bookmarking is as much about tagging, if not more, than just saving and sharing links, and it doesn’t end with the person who saved the link in the first place. As users sift through and discover links from other users, they can add tags too.

How is this working in libraries? In various ways, on either of the reference desk.

Librarians can use social bookmarking sites like Delicious for organizing their own web reference tools, or collecting sites targeted towards specific users groups and having patrons contribute to the collection. This page illustrates all of the sites that have been tagged with the word “webcomic” at the Nashville Public Library’s Delicious site.

At The University of Pennsylvania Library , tags associated with library items form a word cloud, with the most popular tags appearing largest. Visitors to the site can click on any tag and be linked to all of the items associated with that tag. This is a far cry from the traditional way of searching library catalogues by subject searching. For one, the subjects are juxtaposed with titles and other useful information on the face of web sites and pages where patrons already are, and removes the need to go to the catalogue, choose a subject search and then think of words in your topic. For another, classification is no longer solely the domain of the cataloguer. Whereas librarians are classifying items according to authority systems, a user can just click on the topic that interests them and be taken to all of the items with that tag. It also allows for interactivity since users who have read a particular book are able to then go in and create tags they think are useful for future students. Tagging, in its most ideal form, takes advantage of the hive mind, the collective consciousness and shared wisdom of the community by tapping into and building upon individuals’ knowledge.


Are many bees smarter than one bee? Depends on the bee. Wild bee hive, image by Carly & Art, courtesy Creative Commons.

But wait – “in its most ideal form”? That doesn’t sound ideal… Of course things are not so cut and dry.

Tagging, the folksonomy that it is, is just that: named by the folks. And according to Pew Research Centre, almost 30% of us have tagged Web content at some time or another. The good thing about it is that it is democratic and subverts more traditional, hierarchical and sometimes alienating, systems such as the Dewey Decimal System. The ease with which normal people can tag books, websites and products with meaningful labels means that information is accessible to more than just knowledge experts.The bad news is, tags put in by patrons can be uncontrolled, and have little to do with anything other than an utterly subjective interpretation of something’s “about-ness”. I mean, does that mean that we don’t need structured classification systems anymore?

For example, check out this example of customer tagging of of one of my favorite books, Maus I: A Survivor’s Tale: My Father Bleeds History by Art Spiegleman. I’m not sure of the usefulness of the tags “Spring 2004”, “spouse”, or “stuff i lost” in defining or classifying this item.

The solution for libraries then seems to be to strike a balance between organizing information in a structured way that maintains a universal order, while allowing for interactivity and accessibility through methods like tagging. I think tagging’s usefulness comes into play when users interact with it; not only do they create their own tags and search others’ tags, but they get to know other taggers within sites that they like, and the information comes from that kind of interaction. It’s like getting a recommendation for a movie or book from someone: do you share that person’s taste? That makes all the difference in whether or not you will find their descriptions useful.

Blogging in the libraro-sphere

Blogs (from the words “web log”, or an online journal) are like a newsletter, only better. With a link from a website, a library can keep interested visitors informed about what’s going on. These are better than a newsletter because they are free to produce, can contain links, photographs and calendars, and visitors can leave comments, so it’s interactive. Darlene Fichter at Information Today Inc. writes that blogs can help with all kinds of library marketing initiatives, like: promoting events, supporting a library’s users, engaging and supporting community, and building new ties.

But of course things can’t be simple; not everyone likes blogs and thinks they’re a good idea, like this quotation from Michael Gorman, in his article Back Talk: Revenge of the Blog People illustrates:

A blog is a species of interactive electronic diary by means of which the unpublishable, untrammeled by editors or the rules of grammar, can communicate their thoughts via the web.

So obviously, like any tool, a blog is not inherently good simply by nature of its existence but contains possibilities for construction if used with thoughtful consideration and intention. Today’s post takes a critical look at some library blogs – from public, academic, school and special libraries – from around the world.

This blog from the Albany, CA Library in Alameda county, shares reviews of events held at the library. You can get to the blog right from the Library’s main page with a click on a large “Read our Blog” icon. The blog is super simple, with posts and pictures and a format that lets you scroll down to find what interests you. They also have clearly labeled links to navigate to other sites, particular user groups like teens, and photos. I would like to visit this library! From reading their blog, it looks like there is a ton of stuff going on, from author readings to film festivals and community workshops. This library strives (and is apparently successful) in being an integral part of the community it serves.

The Rare Books Blog from the Yale Law Library is an example of a current academic blog. This blog is successful by touching on a few of what Sharyn Heili in her article To Blog or Not to Blog on the blog Libraries and Librarians Rock, outlines as the main purpose of blogs: it reaches users where they are (from the library’s main website); it markets and promotes interesting items from the collection; it highlights staff expertise by making use of the rare books librarian’s specialized knowledge; and it is written in an informal way so as to promote trust and relationship between the library and current and potential users.

I like this blog because it’s full of scanned photographs of rare books, all having to do somehow with law and lawyers; I especially like the old comic book covers with courtroom scenes! It’s also full of links to full text articles and the Library’s catalog. If I were a law student at Yale and I saw this blog, I think I would be motivated to go into the Library and see some of this stuff in person. As far as Heili’s main points about the purpose of blogging, interactivity, I really didn’t see any evidence of this on this blog. There are no comments so it’s hard to gauge how useful this is, or if any students or patrons are actually reading it.

The Yale Library blog has all kinds of cool links on it, including this video for an exhibition titled Superheroes on Court! Lawyers, Law and Comic Books.

Let me say that after scanning at least a dozen elementary, high school and district school library blogs from this wiki listing library blogs, I have yet to find one that is interesting, functional or even legible really. Voices from the Inglenook from the Cold Spring School Library in California is the first to really catch my eye, with graphics that enhance rather than distract, a side bar that clearly navigates a reader through relevant links, and brief, clear posts about library happenings. Still, I can’t figure out who the intended users of this blog might be. Certainly not the students, since the voice is clearly an adult one, with the perspective of providing service to children. I guess it’s for the teachers, since it reviews certain books and the librarian’s experience with reading them aloud to children. I’ll never know since there are no comments in any of the comments fields.

Who's reading the library blog? Not this guy. He's reading a book. Child Reading, by Dihl et Guerhard Manufactory (Boston, MA). Image by takomabiblot, courtesy Creative Commons.

Speaking of comments, I’ve yet to see any in the library blogs I’ve reviewed. There are comments from librarians on blogs about libraries, but rarely from user communities that library blogs are trying to reach. Are information professionals blogging to ourselves? Or are visitors to library blogs more readers than commentators? Leave a comment here if you have an opinion on the matter 🙂